GTO Wizard reports

Same SB lead-vs-check question 3-way but vs a tighter HJ open — how much more cautious does SB become against a narrower preflop range?

Does SB ever lead the flop 3-way after BTN opens at 40bb, and if so on which textures despite SB's range disadvantage?

BTN's c-bet density and sizing when SB and BB both check 3-way at 40bb — which textures keep aggression vs which surrender against two callers.

SB's first-to-act flop strategy in a low-SPR 20bb 3-way SRP — does she ever c-lead vs check to the PFR, and on which textures?

Cross-position comparison of BB's 80bb turn-probe strategy after X-X — where does BB probe more aggressively facing HJ vs BTN?

Find boards at 50bb where BB's backdoor-only no-made-hand combos call BTN's range c-bet at high frequency — the boards regs leak EV by default-raising as bluffs.

Which (flop, turn) pairs in 30bb BTN-vs-BB X-X force BB into trash-bluff territory — paired-low boards with brick turns surface most, plus monotone boards with an A-overcard turn where the flush-completing A makes TP unbluffable.

How LJ's c-bet diverges from BTN's float-bet sizing at 40bb — LJ c-bets more aggressively vs BTN's wider preflop call range than vs HJ's.

How LJ's c-bet sizing diverges from HJ's float-bet sizing across 1755 flops at 40bb LJ-vs-HJ SRP — the closer-position version of the CO-vs-BTN study.

How CO's flop c-bet sizing diverges from BTN's float-bet sizing when CO checks at 40bb SRP — same node, opposite roles.

SB's flop c-bet across three 50bb 3-bet-pot preflop lines starting from a CO open — same actor and postflop position, but the caller identity (CO squeeze-call vs BTN cold-call-then-call-squeeze vs CO HU-3bet-call) shifts the strategy dramatically. Small-tier scope scrape (~207 boards) to see if the divergence is worth pursuing to the large tier.

SB's flop c-bet across three 50bb preflop lines — same board, same actor (SB), but the identity of the pre-flop caller (and whether SB squeezed vs 3-bet HU) changes SB's flop strategy dramatically.

CO opens, folds around to SB who 3-bets to R9.2, CO calls — HU 3-bet pot with no cold-caller in the mix. SB acts first on the flop vs CO's 3-bet-calling range. Baseline HU 3-bet vs CO opener to compare against the two squeeze scenarios.

CO opens, BTN cold-calls, SB squeezes to R9.8, CO folds, BTN calls the squeeze — SB acts first on the flop vs BTN's cold-call-then-call-squeeze range (much wider than CO's would be). Companion to the CO-called variant.

CO opens, BTN cold-calls, SB squeezes to R9.8, BTN folds, CO calls the squeeze — SB acts first on the flop vs CO's squeeze-calling range. Studies how CO's opening-then-defending-a-squeeze range interacts with SB's c-bet at 50bb.

UTG opens, folds around to SB who 3-bets to R9.2, UTG calls — HU 3-bet pot with no CO in the mix. SB acts first on the flop vs UTG's 3-bet-calling range. Baseline HU 3-bet strategy to compare against the two squeeze scenarios.

UTG opens, CO cold-calls, SB squeezes to R9.9, UTG folds, CO calls the squeeze — SB acts first on the flop vs CO's much-wider cold-call range. Companion to the UTG-called version; together they isolate the effect of the caller's preflop range on SB's c-bet strategy.

UTG opens, CO cold-calls, SB squeezes to R9.9, UTG calls, CO folds — SB acts first on the flop vs UTG's squeeze-calling range. Studies how SB's c-bet strategy shifts when the caller is the tight PFR (UTG) rather than the wider CO.